Laurence Tribe

American Lawyer And Law School Professor

Laurence Tribe was born in Shanghai, China on October 10th, 1941 and is the American Lawyer And Law School Professor. At the age of 83, Laurence Tribe biography, profession, age, height, weight, eye color, hair color, build, measurements, education, career, dating/affair, family, news updates, and networth are available.

Date of Birth
October 10, 1941
Nationality
United States
Place of Birth
Shanghai, China
Age
83 years old
Zodiac Sign
Libra
Profession
Lawyer
Social Media
Laurence Tribe Height, Weight, Eye Color and Hair Color

At 83 years old, Laurence Tribe physical status not available right now. We will update Laurence Tribe's height, weight, eye color, hair color, build, and measurements.

Height
Not Available
Weight
Not Available
Hair Color
Not Available
Eye Color
Not Available
Build
Not Available
Measurements
Not Available
Laurence Tribe Religion, Education, and Hobbies
Religion
Not Available
Hobbies
Not Available
Education
Harvard University (AB, JD)
Laurence Tribe Spouse(s), Children, Affair, Parents, and Family
Spouse(s)
Not Available
Children
Not Available
Dating / Affair
Not Available
Parents
Not Available
Laurence Tribe Career

After graduating from law school, Tribe clerked for justice Mathew Tobriner of the Supreme Court of California from 1966 to 1967, then for justice Potter Stewart of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1967 to 1968. He then joined the Harvard Law School faculty as an assistant professor, receiving tenure in 1972. Among his law students and research assistants while on the faculty at Harvard have been former President Barack Obama (a research assistant for over two years), Chief Justice John Roberts, US Senator Ted Cruz, Former D.C. Circuit Chief Judge and Attorney General Merrick Garland, and Associate Justice Elena Kagan. Other notable students of Tribe were U.S. Representative Adam Schiff, Chair of the House Intelligence Committee and lead manager for the first Impeachment of Donald Trump, and Jamie Raskin, lead manager for the second Donald Trump impeachment.

In 1978, Tribe published the first version of what has become one of the core texts on its subject, American Constitutional Law. It has since been updated and expanded a number of times.

In 1983, Tribe represented Unification Church leader Sun Myung Moon in the appeal of his federal conviction on income tax charges.

Tribe represented the restaurant Grendel's Den in the case Larkin v Grendel's Den in which the restaurant challenged a Massachusetts law that allowed religious establishments to prohibit liquor sales in neighboring properties. The case reached the United States Supreme Court in 1982 and the court overturned the law as violating of the separation of church and state. The Lawyer's Guide to Writing Well criticizes the opening of his brief as a "thicket of confusing citations and unnecessary definitions" stating that it would have been "measurably strengthened" if he had used the "more lively imagery" that he had used in a footnote later in the document.

In the 1985 National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education Supreme Court case, Tribe represented the National Gay Task Force who had won an Appeals Court ruling against an Oklahoma law that would have allowed schools to fire teachers who were attracted to people of the same sex or spoke in favor of civil rights for LGBT people. The Supreme Court deadlocked, which left the Appeals Court's favorable ruling in place, declaring the law would have violated the First Amendment.

The Supreme Court ruled against Tribe's client in Bowers v. Hardwick in 1986 and held that a Georgia state law criminalizing sodomy, as applied to consensual acts between persons of the same sex, did not violate fundamental liberties under the principle of substantive due process. However, in 2003 the Supreme Court overruled Bowers in Lawrence v. Texas, a case for which Tribe wrote the ACLU's amicus curiae brief supporting Lawrence, who was represented by Lambda Legal.

Tribe testified at length during the Senate confirmation hearings in 1987 about the Robert Bork Supreme Court nomination, arguing that Bork's stand on the limitation of rights in the Constitution would be unique in the history of the Court. His participation in the hearings raised his profile outside of the legal realm and he became a target of right-wing critics. His phone was later found to have been wiretapped, but it was never discovered who had placed the device or why.

Tribe's 1990 book Abortion: Clash of Absolutes, was called "informative, lucidly written and cogently reasoned" in a review in the Journal of the American Bar Association.

In 1992, Tribe reargued Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., before the Supreme Court on behalf of Cipollone, .

Tribe was part of Al Gore's legal team regarding the results of the 2000 United States presidential election. Due to the close nature of the vote count, recounts had been initiated in Florida, and the recounts had been challenged in court. Tribe argued the initial case in Federal Court in Miami in which they successfully argued that the court should not stop the recount of the votes which was taking place and scheduled to take place in certain counties. David Boies argued for the Gore team in a related matter in the Florida State Courts regarding the dates that Secretary of State of Florida Katherine Harris would accept recounts. When the original Federal case, Bush v. Gore, was appealed, Gore and his advisers decided at the last minute to have Boies instead of Tribe argue the case at the Supreme Court. The court determined that recounts of votes should cease and that accordingly George W. Bush had been elected president.

Since the mid-1990s, Tribe has represented a number of corporations advocating for their free speech rights and constitutional personhood. Tribe represented General Electric in its defense against its liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("Superfund"), in which GE and Tribe unsuccessfully argued that the act unconstitutionally violated General Electric's due process rights.

In 2014, Tribe was retained to represent Peabody Energy in a suit against the Environmental Protection Agency. Tribe argued that EPA's use of the Clean Air Act to implement its Clean Power Plan was unconstitutional. Tribe's legal analysis has been criticized by other legal commentators, including fellow Harvard Law School professors Richard J. Lazarus and Jody Freeman, who described his conclusion as "wholly without merit". His advocacy for corporations like Peabody has been criticized by some legal experts.

On September 25, 2020, Tribe was named as one of the 25 members of the "Real Facebook Oversight Board", an independent monitoring group over Facebook.

Source

Despite being born in the United States, Trump's vehement 'birther' slur against Haley is revealed in a tweet that Nikki is ineligible to run for president because she is the daughter of Indian migrants

www.dailymail.co.uk, January 10, 2024
Donald Trump debunks a new 'birther' lie on social media on Tuesday, saying that Nikki Haley was ineligible to run for president because her parents were not non-U.S. citizens when she was born. According to the United States Constitution, only those born in the United States are eligible for the presidency, but it does not mention the parents' immigrant status. Paul Ingrassia, a law clerk who graduated from law school in 2022 and describes himself on X as a 'constitutional scholar,' made the assertion.' Ingrassia's accusation was nonsense, according to Laurence Tribe, a Harvard Law School professor who emeritus, and it was absurd that Trump praised it. I can't imagine what Trump hopes to gain from those allegations unless it's to play the race card against the former governor and UN ambassador as a woman of color - and to draw on the rich veins of anti-immigrant mistrust by reminding everyone that Haley's parents weren't residents when she was born in the United States.'

REVEALED: The four Colorado justices who booted Trump off the ballot - Ivy League scholars, a gay icon and a jazz musician - as legal experts warn they've lit a fuse under American democracy

www.dailymail.co.uk, December 20, 2023
In a 4-3 decision by Democratic-appointed justices, Colorado's high court found that the ex-president and 2024 candidate isn't eligible for the presidency. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that the former president had breached the 14th Amendment's insurrectionist clause for his omission in January 6. Following the Civil War, the 14th Amendment was accepted, but it does not prohibit officials from seeking future office unless they have 'engaged in rebellion.'

What the Colorado decision means for Trump: The Supreme Court's decision would determine what the final decision will be made

www.dailymail.co.uk, December 20, 2023
The long-shot legal theory has invoked Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, which prohibits those who participated in 'insurrection or rebellion' from holding office. Although the decision seems to have stymied the former president's reelection aspirations, it would not be surprising that the Supreme Court decision would do more to actually hinder the Republican nominee.
Laurence Tribe Tweets